Contributors | Affiliation | Role |
---|---|---|
Berelson, William M. | University of Southern California (USC) | Principal Investigator |
Adkins, Jess F. | California Institute of Technology (Caltech) | Co-Principal Investigator |
Dong, Sijia | University of Southern California (USC) | Scientist, Contact |
Liu, Xuewu | University of South Florida (USF) | Scientist |
Naviaux, John D. | California Institute of Technology (Caltech) | Scientist |
Rollins, Nick E. | University of Southern California (USC) | Scientist |
Subhas, Adam V. | Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) | Scientist |
Rauch, Shannon | Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI BCO-DMO) | BCO-DMO Data Manager |
Water samples were collected at 24 different depths during each CTD cast. Temperature, salinity, [O2], density and fluorescence were measured in situ both downcast and upcast. After CTD recovery, water samples were collected and DIC, pH, d13C of DIC were measured onboard. Other parameters in the carbonate system were calculated using CO2SYS.
DIC and d13C were measured using a Picarro Cavity Ring-Down Spectroscopy (G2131-i). pH was measured using a Varian Cary 400 spectrophotometer. The CTD included a rosette of 24 10L bottles.
Data columns d13C_DIC_PDB_USC1 and d13C_DIC_PDB_USC2 were measured by the USC and Caltech groups. All other data columns to the right (d13C_DIC_PDB_USF1 and d13C_DIC_PDB_USF2, Alk, DIC, pH, OmegaCa, and OmegaAr) were measured by the USF group.
BCO-DMO Processing:
Version 1:
- renamed fields;
- converted latitude and longitude to decimal degrees.
Version 2:
- renamed fields;
- converted latitude and longitude to decimal degrees.
Version History:
Version 1 of this dataset was replaced by version 2 on 2022-01-31. Version 2 contains additional measurements (water column densities, nutrients, and AOUs) and has the CTD downcast columns removed. In version 2, only the mean values for duplicate measurements in the carbonate system parameters are reported.
File |
---|
CTD.csv (Comma Separated Values (.csv), 57.25 KB) MD5:0e9b9946e08dc21cdf9d72859cfcbccb Primary data file for dataset ID 836954 |
Parameter | Description | Units |
Station | station number | unitless |
CastNo | cast number | unitless |
Latitude | latitude | decimal degrees North |
Longitude | longitude | decimal degrees East |
Bottle | bottle number | unitless |
Depth | ctd depth | meters |
Pressure | water pressure at depth | decibars (dbar) |
Temp | Water temparature | degrees Celsius |
Sal | salinity | psu |
O2 | oxygen concentration | micromoles per kilogram |
Density | seawater density | kilogram per cubic meter |
Fluorescence | fluorescence concentration | milligrams per cubic meter |
Theta | Potential temperature | degrees Celsius |
Density_anomaly | Density anomaly from 1000 kg/m3 | kilograms per cubic meter |
Sigma0 | Sigma-theta referenced to surface pressure | kilograms per cubic meter |
Sigma4 | Density anomaly referenced to 4 km | kilograms per cubic meter |
Phosphate | phosphate concentration | micromoles per kilogram |
Nitrate | nitrate concentration | micromoles per kilogram |
Silicate | silicate concentration | micromoles per kilogram |
AOU | aparent oxygen utilization | micromoles per kilogram |
Alk | total alkalinity | micromoles per kilogram |
DIC | dissolved inorganic carbon | micromoles per kilogram |
d13C_DIC | isotopic cmposition of DIC | per mil (‰) |
pHTpTS | pH at in situ temperature and pressure conditions | unitless |
pHTp0T25S | pH at 25 °C and surface pressure | unitless |
OmegaCa_Alk_DIC_PTS | calcite saturation state | unitless |
OmegaCa_Alk_pH_corr_PTS | calcite saturation state | unitless |
OmegaCa_pH_corr_DIC_PTS | calcite saturation state | unitless |
OmegaAr_Alk_DIC_PTS | aragonite saturation state | unitless |
OmegaAr_Alk_pH_incorr_PTS | aragonite saturation state | unitless |
OmegaAr_pH_corr_DIC_PTS | aragonite saturation state | unitless |
Dataset-specific Instrument Name | Picarro Cavity Ring-Down Spectroscopy (G2131-i) |
Generic Instrument Name | Cavity enhanced absorption spectrometers |
Generic Instrument Description | Instruments that illuminate a sample inside an optical cavity, typically using laser light, and measure the concentration or amount of a species in gas phase by absorption spectroscopy. Techniques include cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS) and integrated cavity output spectroscopy (ICOS). |
Dataset-specific Instrument Name | CTD with 24 bottle rosette |
Generic Instrument Name | CTD - profiler |
Generic Instrument Description | The Conductivity, Temperature, Depth (CTD) unit is an integrated instrument package designed to measure the conductivity, temperature, and pressure (depth) of the water column. The instrument is lowered via cable through the water column. It permits scientists to observe the physical properties in real-time via a conducting cable, which is typically connected to a CTD to a deck unit and computer on a ship. The CTD is often configured with additional optional sensors including fluorometers, transmissometers and/or radiometers. It is often combined with a Rosette of water sampling bottles (e.g. Niskin, GO-FLO) for collecting discrete water samples during the cast.
This term applies to profiling CTDs. For fixed CTDs, see https://www.bco-dmo.org/instrument/869934. |
Dataset-specific Instrument Name | Varian Cary 400 spectrophotometer |
Generic Instrument Name | Spectrophotometer |
Generic Instrument Description | An instrument used to measure the relative absorption of electromagnetic radiation of different wavelengths in the near infra-red, visible and ultraviolet wavebands by samples. |
Website | |
Platform | R/V Kilo Moana |
Start Date | 2017-08-01 |
End Date | 2017-09-01 |
Description | Additional cruise information is available from the Rolling Deck to Repository (R2R): https://www.rvdata.us/search/cruise/KM1712 |
NSF Award Abstract:
Ocean acidification (OA) is the decrease in seawater pH due to increased oceanic uptake of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere. The impact of this uptake in the marine environment is lessened by the dissolution of calcium carbonate (CaCO3) to calcium and carbonate ions, allowing carbonate ions to bind free hydrogen ions that cause the decrease in pH. Researchers from the University of Southern California and California Institute of Technology have developed a new method for determining carbonate dissolution rates that work in both laboratory and field settings. Preliminary data using this technique has revealed a distinct difference in measured rates between those obtained in the laboratory and those in the field. It is crucial that laboratory and field measurements be standardized to be able to accurately study and compare dissolution rate studies. As such, the researchers will perform extensive fieldwork and laboratory to bridge the gap between these dissolution rate measurements. Results will be widely useful to the ocean chemistry community, especially modelers, wishing to study any aspect of ocean carbonate chemistry, as well as paleoceanographers using carbonate material to study past ocean conditions. Graduate students will be co-mentored by the researchers, and the University of Southern California's (USC) Young Researcher Program will allow the researchers to involve local high school students. USC International Relations students will be involved in the project, not only gaining scientific experience, but also will learn the policy aspect of the science.
Calcium carbonate (CaCO3) dissolution helps to mitigate the effects of ocean acidification (OA) and is a key factor in the ocean's alkalinity balance. The researchers have recently developed a novel tracer methodology which can monitor carbonate dissolution rates in both the lab and field. This method traces the transfer of 13C from labeled solids to seawater. Using this method has led to breakthroughs in understanding the controls of CaCO3 dissolution kinetics, but it has also revealed that the measurements made in a lab and in the field are not entirely in line. It is crucial to be able to correlate these two measurements to be able to fully study and understand the dynamics of CaCO3 dissolution. Therefore, the researchers will extend their previous work to standardize the results of measurements in the lab with those in the ocean. The North Pacific Ocean with a gradient in carbonate saturation states will be used for the field study, and lab-based experiments will allow the researchers to constrain variables such as pressure, the dissolved inorganic carbon/alkalinity ratio, and concentrations of phosphate. This research will further understanding of OA, the mechanisms controlling carbonate dissolution, and how the ocean modulates its alkalinity budget.
NSF Award Abstract:
Ocean acidification by anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions to the atmosphere will ultimately be balanced by sedimentary carbonate dissolution. The time constant for this reaction, however, is ca. 6,000 years. So, in the coming decades, the ocean's response to CO2 uptake will be based on the kinetics of supply and removal, not on the thermodynamics of the system. Unfortunately our understanding of the basic rate law for carbonate dissolution in the ocean is lacking. The order of the rate law is still argued to be anywhere from 1 to 4.5; this range represents a major difference in the sensitivity of the system to small changes in saturation state. The relative importance of aragonite vs. calcite dissolution, the influence of magnesium content in the minerals, and the sign of the role of organic matter are all still unknowns in the modern ocean. Of course, a truly useful rate law would be able to combine the relative importance of all of these factors into a predictive rule for how dissolution will respond to ocean acidification.
In this study, researchers at the California Institute of Technology and the University of Southern California will address this problem with a novel set of laboratory and in situ experiments that use carbon-13 (13C) tracer labeled biogenic carbonates to measure the dissolution rate under a wide range of saturation states. They will assemble a set of rules that will govern carbonate dissolution in sinking particles and in marine sediments. This will require two sub-projects. First, they will culture several different species of biogenic carbonate producers in the lab under the influence of a strong 13C label. With enrichments of around 30,000o/oo in the calcium carbonate (CaCO3), they will measure the change in dissolved inorganic carbon-13 at several time points over 1-2 weeks in specially built high-pressure reaction chambers. The construction of a prototype chamber is completed and it provides the means, for the first time, to control carbonate saturation state by changing seawater chemistry, pressure, and temperature independently. Experiments with pure 13C labeled inorganic CaCO3 will provide the inorganic reference frame for the biogenic carbonate results. Secondly, to check the lab-based rate data, they will also use labeled biogenic particles in a simple Niskin bottle based reactor that will be deployable on regular hydrowire. The accumulation of 13C in the Niskin dissolved inorganic carbon over 1-2 days will provide an initial rate that is directly comparable to the more extensive laboratory study on the same sorts of materials. Using the San Pedro Basin as a test bed for these in situ experiments will sample a range of saturation states in a series of 3-day cruises. This high-sensitivity approach should allow the team to unpack the various components of carbonate dissolution in seawater under rising CO2 concentrations.
Broader Impacts. Producing a better rate law for carbonate dissolution will have broad implications for the fields of marine chemistry, marine biology, paleoceanography, and for potential societal response to ocean acidification. This rate law sits at the heart of the marine carbonate cycle. In addition, this work will benefit at least two graduate students and promote US-Israel collaborations via the inclusion of Jonathan Erez and his students. The specific involvement of underrepresented high school students in scientific/oceanographic research is built into the efforts of this project as well as ongoing efforts by both PIs to communicate their science to a broad array of non-scientific audiences.
Funding Source | Award |
---|---|
NSF Division of Ocean Sciences (NSF OCE) | |
NSF Division of Ocean Sciences (NSF OCE) | |
NSF Division of Ocean Sciences (NSF OCE) |