Images collected during surveys with deep-submergence vehicles
Three imaging surveys near the 9 50’ N hydrothermal vent field on the East Pacific Rise, two on inactive sulfide mounds and one on the nearby flat oceanic rise, were conducted during research expeditions on the RV Atlantis (AT42-21) and RV Roger Revelle (RR2102). Images of the seafloor were collected with a downward-facing Ocean Imaging Systems (OIS) Model D3300 24,000 Digital Still Camera (Nikon D7100 SLR) with image size 6000 x 4000 pixels (24 megapixel). The camera was mounted on the human occupied vehicle Alvin on Dive 5044 at Lucky’s Mound on 25 December 2019 and the remotely-operated vehicle Jason II on Dive 1309 on the oceanic rise (between Lucky’s Mound and Sentry Spire) on 7 April 2021 and Dive 1311 at Sentry Spire on 9 April 2021. The camera captured images every 5 or 10 seconds in sync with 300 Watt/s high intensity strobe lights. We thank Dr. Daniel Fornari and the WHOI-SSSG/MISO Facility for access to the MISO Imagery © Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI).
Each survey was designed to cover a comparable area (within ~60 m x 60 m bounding box) and, for the inactive sulfides, to also cover vertical habitat variation. For the oceanic rise survey, the vehicle traveled at ~0.5 km hr-1 at an altitude of ~5 m above the seafloor; there was more variability in speed and altitude on the inactive features due to challenging topography. In particular, the altitude of Sentry Spire images was often greater than 5 m. Spatiotemporal data to associate with each image were collected by the vehicles and processed on-ship after each dive (i.e., re-navigated position, depth, and altitude per UTC timestamp) and are available from the U.S. National Deep Submergence Facility (NDSF). The camera had an internal clock for UTC timestamp which was synced with the vehicle clock with the exception of Alvin Dive 5044, for which the MISO timestamp is 13 minutes and 20 seconds ahead of the actual UTC timestamp.
Images that were poorly illuminated or out of focus were removed from the study. Overlapping images were removed to prevent duplicate sampling. For each of the three surveys, the remaining images were randomly subsampled to a set of 49 (Lucky’s Mound), 50 (Oceanic Rise), and 44 (Sentry Spire) images. Images from Lucky’s Mound and Sentry Spire were categorized to approximate vertical position: Spire, Apron, or Base. Two image filenames are marked with an asterisk. One (RR2102_J1311_OID_20210409T160036) is an incorrect filename; the image annotated in the ImageJ Stack did not match the original with this filename. One (RR2102_J1311_OID_20210409T154531) has one incorrect count likely due to association to the incorrect filename within the annotated set of Sentry Spire images.
Counts by morphotype per image per survey
Organisms visible in the total of 143 survey images were manually annotated to a numbered morphotype using ImageJ public domain software. Organisms could be resolved to at least 3 cm (as described in next section). Morphotype numbers were assigned in ascending order per site. Images were annotated per survey in “stacks” of 5 - 10; we concatenated the per-stack output tables of counts per numbered morphotype using an R script.
Co-author M. Meneses annotated megafauna for images from Lucky’s Mound and Oceanic Rise. For Sentry Spire co-author A. Best initially annotated, and then for consistency across sites M. Meneses validated and added to the annotations. Combining all ImageJ annotations resulted in 2413 annotations; however 91 annotations were determined to be abiotic, and 9 appeared biotic but could not be assigned to morphotype, resulting in the total of 2313 counts.
Area per image per survey
- Estimating from vehicle altitude and camera field of view
Since the down-looking images did not have paired lasers for scale, camera altitude (m above seafloor) and field of view were used for trigonometric estimate of the total area of each image. For the ROV Jason II dives at Sentry Spire and Oceanic Rise, the camera was mounted near and at the same vertical position as the vehicle altimeter, thus camera altitude was approximately the same as vehicle altitude. However, for the HOV Alvin dive at Lucky’s Mound, the camera was mounted forward of and 1.03 m lower than the vehicle altimeter, thus we subtracted 1.03 m from vehicle altitude for an initial estimate of camera altitude.
The camera was fitted with a Nikkor 20mm f2.8 lens behind a domed optical port that produced a 38.6° x 55.7° field of view. Initial image area was calculated by multiplying the resulting values from the following 2 functions in an EXCEL spreadsheet, in which H is camera altitude:
=TAN(19.3*PI()/180)*H*2
=TAN(27.85*PI()/180)*H*2
We thank Dr. Daniel Fornari for angle calculations for the camera’s field of view from inside the pressure housing; we selected the angle calculation for 3.2 m altitude (the higher of two altitudes with angle calculations). We thank Karl Roberts for diagramming the trigonometric calculation.
Using other down-looking images from cruises AT42-21 and RR2102, we confirmed when the vehicles were descending to the seafloor that images were in focus when the camera altitude was less than 8 m. Note this results in maximum area per image 47.37 m2, with minimum resolution of 7.1 pixels per cm.
- Trimming portions out of focus for a subset of images
For a subset of images from Lucky’s Mound and Sentry Spire where topographic variation within an image caused portions to be out of focus, only the portions in focus were used for megafauna counts and area estimates. Image “trimming” was carried out using the ImageJ tool “Freehand selection” to select the useable portions of an image while excluding portions out of focus. The ImageJ “Measure” function was then used to count pixels within this selection. The Useable_Proportion_of_Image is the fraction of pixels selected out of 24 megapixel, which reduced the final area reported for only 1 image from Lucky’s Mound (which was also the only image with initial estimate of camera altitude > 8 m) and 9 from Sentry Spire (including the 4 with initial estimate of camera altitude > 8 m).
- Scaling to correct area for a subset of images
For a subset of images from Lucky’s Mound and Sentry Spire with complex topography, the initial estimate of camera altitude appeared inadequate for an accurate image scale. In particular for the imaging survey with Alvin at Lucky’s Mound, we needed to better estimate the camera altitude when Alvin was transiting up-slope because the camera was situated forward of the altimeter, thus, closer to the seafloor. We categorized each image as occurring during transit over relatively flat seafloor (Flat), or moving up-slope (Up) or down-slope (Down).
We were able to calibrate the scale by using known sizes of megafaunal taxa from other imagery. Images of galatheid squat lobsters (Munidopsis), unstalked crinoids (Antedonidae), and shrimp (Nematocarcinidae) were selected from close-up, high-resolution (4K) videos of the study sites acquired with Alvin on a later cruise (AT50-06, December 2022). Beams from parallel lasers mounted 10 cm apart were visible in each screenshot and allowed for accurate measurement of those individuals using ImageJ. After measuring multiple (>5) individuals of each morphotype, an “actual measured” size range was calculated for use in assessing, and adjusting if necessary, the scale for survey images containing these morphotypes. For survey images containing these three morphotypes, we measured 1 (or 2, if possible) individuals to obtain an initial size estimate. When the measured value (initial size estimate) exceeded expectations from the actual measured range, an Adjustment_Value was calculated in EXCEL as Expected / Measured, in which Expected was the actual measured maximum. In general we did not apply scaling to transit Flat because we found there was no need for scaling to bring morphotypes into actual measured range [median Adjustment_Value 1]. We also confirmed this by measuring shrimp in the survey at Oceanic Rise, and all but one were within range (and that one was only 0.1 cm out of range). For the 12 Sentry Spire images transiting Up or Down but without any calibrated morphotypes in view, the scale was linearly interpolated from the previous and subsequent, reliably scaled, images in the time series using an R script.
Ultimately, scaling was applied for 15 images from Lucky’s Mound and 18 from Sentry Spire in the column Corrected_Area_m2. The total Corrected_Area_m2 for the 143 survey images was 2654 m2.
Taxon and feeding mode assignment per morphotype
To harmonize morphotypes across sites we created a photo atlas and “CreatureDex” table to match the per-site morphotype numbers. We used the CreatureDex to give each morphotype an initial, unique label (verbatimIdentification). Morphotypes were assigned to the lowest possible taxonomic level by referencing scientific literature, online databases, and expert opinions. When morphotypes with similar appearance could not be distinguished reliably, they were grouped together into a higher taxonomic level (e.g., various brittle stars grouped into Ophiurida). The total number of harmonized morphotypes was 51, and we provide the cropped images for the 51 morphotypes in the file “cropped_images_CreatureDex-2024-07-05.zip”. We standardized our morphotype labels to scientific names and corresponding AphiaIDs in the World Register of Marine Species as part of the minimal requirement for inclusion of these data in the Ocean Biodiversity Information System (OBIS).
Each morphotype was categorized into 1 of 7 feeding modes for which we slightly modified definitions from the “Characteristic feeding method” in the Biological Traits Information Catalogue (BIOTIC; MarLIN 2006): Suspension Feeder Passive (“Suspension feeder: Passive” in BIOTIC), Suspension Feeder Active (“Suspension feeder: Active”), Deposit Feeder (“Deposit feeder”), Scavenger (“Scavenger”), Predator (“Predator”), Grazer (“Grazer (surface / substratum)”), and Unknown (“Insufficient information”). Feeding mode assignment was inferred from studies of closely related taxa as reported in textbooks and peer-reviewed literature.
Unique taxa in this dataset (WoRMS_scientificName, WoRMS_scientificNameID):
* Note that there are fewer unique taxa than unique morphotypes due to standardized classification at high taxonomic level.
Actiniaria, urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1360
Animalia, urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:2
Antedonidae, urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:123148
Anthomastus, urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:125285
Anthozoa, urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1292
Aphroditidae, urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:938
Asteroidea, urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:123080
Asterozoa, urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:148743
Bathycrinidae, urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:123144
Brisingida, urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:123085
Bryozoa, urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:146142
Bythograeidae, urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:106746
Cladorhizidae, urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:131644
Elasipodida, urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:123112
Gastropoda, urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:101
Halosauridae, urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:125500
Hexactinellida, urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:22612
Holothuroidea, urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:123083
Hydrozoa, urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1337
Munidopsis, urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:106836
Munnopsidae, urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:118264
Nematocarcinidae, urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:106784
Octocorallia, urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1341
Ophidiiformes, urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:10314
Ophiurida, urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:123117
Paguroidea, urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:106687
Pantopoda, urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1358
Polychaeta, urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:883
Polyplacophora, urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:55
Porifera, urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:558
Primnoidae, urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:125278
Rossellidae, urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:131694
Tentaculata, urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:1249
Vulcanoctopus, urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:341470
Xenophyophoroidea, urn:lsid:marinespecies.org:taxname:736980