Dataset: Recruit area measurements
View Data: Data not available yet
Data Citation:
Williamson, O., Baker, A. (2024) Area of Orbicella faveolata recruits hosting different proportions of various symbiont genera from a symbiont acquisition laboratory experiment conducted in 2018 and 2019. Biological and Chemical Oceanography Data Management Office (BCO-DMO). (Version 1) Version Date 2024-03-04 [if applicable, indicate subset used]. http://lod.bco-dmo.org/id/dataset/920846 [access date]
Terms of Use
This dataset is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.
If you wish to use this dataset, it is highly recommended that you contact the original principal investigators (PI). Should the relevant PI be unavailable, please contact BCO-DMO (info@bco-dmo.org) for additional guidance. For general guidance please see the BCO-DMO Terms of Use document.
Spatial Extent: N:25.1388 E:-80.295 S:25.1388 W:-80.295
Parents of recruits used in this study were located on Horseshoe Reef in Key Largo, FL at 5 - 8 meters depth (25.1388°N, 80.2950°W).
Temporal Extent: 2018-08 - 2019-05
Principal Investigator:
Olivia Williamson (University of Miami Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, UM-RSMAS)
Co-Principal Investigator:
Andrew Baker (University of Miami Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, UM-RSMAS)
BCO-DMO Data Manager:
Amber D. York (Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, WHOI BCO-DMO)
Version:
1
Version Date:
2024-03-04
Restricted:
No
Validated:
No
Current State:
Data not available
Area of Orbicella faveolata recruits hosting different proportions of various symbiont genera from a symbiont acquisition laboratory experiment conducted in 2018 and 2019
Abstract:
This dataset includes area (mm2) of Orbicella faveolata recruits hosting different proportions of various symbiont genera.
These data correspond to research presented in Williamson et al. (2021), published in Coral Reefs and funded in part by the NSF project "Symbiont Shifts on Reefs". They were used to test if Orbicella faveolata recruits could establish symbiosis with D. trenchii supplied by nearby “donor” colonies and examined the resulting ecological trade-offs to evaluate early Symbiodiniaceae manipulation as a scalable tool for reef restoration. We exposed aposymbiotic recruits to 29 °C or 31 °C and to fragments of Montastraea cavernosa (containing Cladocopium ITS2 type C3) or Siderastrea siderea (containing D. trenchii). Next, a subset of recruits were exposed to a 60-day heat stress. These data include survivorship and symbiont acquisition rates, symbiont identity and density data (derived using qPCR), polyp area measurements, and scoring of bleaching and survivorship during a heat stress experiment. Overall, proportion of D. trenchii hosted was negatively correlated with polyp size and symbiont density, indicating a trade-off between growth (of both host and symbiont) and heat tolerance. These findings suggest that, while donor colonies may be effective sources for seeding coral recruits with thermotolerant symbionts, practitioners will need to balance the likely benefits and costs of these approaches when designing restoration strategies.