Dataset: Sargassum Puerto Rico 2018: Bulk properties
Deployment: HRS1608

Location description: 

Water samples were collected between 30 May and 6 June, 2018 at various sites around Puerto Rico (blue squares in figure above). Sampling was concentrated in Fajardo at Laguna Grande, a 50 hectare saltwater lagoon located in the Las Cabezas de San Juan Nature Reserve in the northeast corner of Puerto Rico (Detailed map in figure above). Laguna Grande has an average depth of 3 m, a maximum depth of 5 m, and is connected to the Atlantic Ocean at the beach in Las Croabas, Fajardo by a shallow 1.5 km channel (USGS). The lagoon is surrounded by mangrove swamps, tidal flats and brackish lagoons. It has been estimated that Laguna Grande flushes 13% of its water volume during every tidal cycle on average (USGS), corresponding to an average flushing rate of once every 7.7 days. Sargassum wracks were inundating both Laguna Grande and Las Croabas when sampling began, so no samples were collected before the event. However, because Sargassum was beaching in Las Croabas and entering the lagoon through the channel, it was expected that the entire lagoon would be impacted by Sargassum regardless of sampling time during the tidal cycle. 

Sampling and analytical procedures:

At various sites throughout the lagoon and Las Croabas and offshore near Salinas (Figure above), samples for DOM characterization were collected in 10 L low density polyethylene cubitainers that had been previously cleaned with 0.1 N NaOH and rinsed several times with ultrapure MilliQ water. All containers were rinsed at least three times with sample before collection. Samples for DOM characterization were filtered through 0.7 µm GF/F filters (Whatman ®) that had been previously combusted for 4 h at 500 °C into 1 or 2 L glass bottles. Subsamples were reserved in 40 mL glass vials and acidified to pH 2 using concentrated HCl for dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and total dissolved nitrogen (TDN) measurements or left untreated for optical property (absorbance and fluorescence) analyses and stored at 4°C. The remaining ~1 L samples were then acidified to pH 2 using concentrated HCl and DOM was isolated using a solid phase extraction (SPE) technique. Briefly, samples were then drawn through clean Teflon tubing (rinsed with pH 2 ultrapure water) and connected to 1 g Bond Elut Priority PolLutant (PPL) cartridges (Agilent). PPL cartridges were previously activated with methanol (LC-MS Chromasolv, Sigma Aldrich) and rinsed with 0.1% formic acid water (LC-MS Chromasolv Sigma Aldrich).  After extraction, all cartridges were rinsed with at 0.1% formic acid water and dried in a vacuum manifold. Dried cartridges were wrapped in foil and stored at 4 °C until returning to the Chesapeake Biological Laboratory. Before elution, cartridges were re-rinsed with 0.1% formic acid water and dried again under a hood using a vacuum manifold. DOM samples were then eluted with 10 mL ultrapure methanol into clean amber glass vials and stored at -20 °C until mass spectrometric analysis (described below). 

DOC and TDN analyses

DOC and TDN were determined using a Shimadzu Total Organic Carbon Analyzer (TOC-VCPH), and ultrapure water served as both DOC and TDN blanks. DOC standards were prepared in ultrapure water using potassium hydrogen phthalate and ranged from 0 to 20 mg C L-1. TDN standards were prepared in the same manner using potassium nitrate and ranged from 0 to 10 mg N L-1. Like samples, all standards and blanks were acidified to pH 2 using concentrated HCl prior to analysis. If any samples fell outside of the calibration curve, they were diluted with ultrapure water and reanalyzed.

Determination of optical properties

Samples were pipetted into a 1 cm fluorescence cuvette. Absorbance and fluorescence were simultaneously recorded at 3 nm intervals between excitation wavelengths of 230 and 550 nm using a Horiba Aqualog system. Ultrapure water served as the absorbance and fluorescence blank, and was subtracted from all scans. To generate excitation-emission matrix spectra (EEMS), a fluorescence emission spectrum was recorded at a fixed wavelength range between 230 and 597 nm (~3.3 nm intervals) for every excitation wavelength using 1 - 15 sec integration time depending on sample absorbance. Rayleigh scattering signals were removed from all EEM spectra in Matlab® using methods described in Zepp et al. 2004,  and any inner filter effects were corrected using the Aqualog software. EEM spectra were normalized to the water Raman scattering peak, thus all EEMS are reported in water Raman units (RU). The following additional parameters were also calculated:

Apeak: intensity and location of maximum in the "A" region (ex/em <260 nm/400 – 460 nm)  in (intensity x ex. location x em. location) (Coble et al. 1996)

Cpeak: intensity and location of maximum in the "C" region (ex/em 320 – 360 nm/420 – 460 nm) in (intensity x ex. location x em. location) (Coble et al. 1996)

Fluorescence Index, FI Ratio of fluorescence emission at 470 nm / 520 nm at 370 nm excitation Indicative of DOM source (McKnight et al. 2001)

normalized HIX (nHIX) Integrated emission from 435-480 / (300-345 + 435-480) nm at 254 nm excitation Indicative of DOM source and processing (Ohno 2002a)

Biological Index (BIX) Ratio of the fluorescence intensity at 380 nm to 430 nm at 310 nm excitation Indication of recent microbial activity (Huguet et al. 2009)

In addition to the absorbance scans that accompany fluorescence scans, separate absorbance (A(λ)) scans were recorded for all samples between 230 and 700 nm. Raw A(λ)) spectra were corrected for any offsets by subtracting the absorbance at 700 nm from each spectrum. Corrected absorbances (Acorr(λ)) were converted to the Naperian absorption coefficient (a(λ)) with the following equation

a(λ) = 2.303×Acorr(λ)/L                                                                                                  

where λ is the wavelength and L is the pathlength of the spectrofluorometer cuvette (i.e. 0.01 m). Spectral slopes were determined from 275-295 nm (S(275-295)) and from 350 – 400 nm (S(350-400)) as the slope of the log-normalized absorbance spectrum from 275-295 nm and 350-400 nm, respectively. Slope ratio (SR) is the ratio of S(275-295) to S(350-400) as defined previously (Helms et al. 2008). E2:E3 ratio is the ratio of absorbance at 250 nm to that 365 nm (De Haan and De Boer 1987). Fluorescence and absorbance data files are located in the “PuertoRicoAbsFluor.zip” (see Supplemental files).